Business Analysis Toolkit

Software test results analysis plays a very important role in software development.  The test process itself is crucial to the success of new software products.  It is only through efficient system testing that the quality and safety of an application can be guaranteed.  For software businesses, there is no excuse for a poor quality.  This is the reason why companies use several testing methods – to perfect their product before introducing it to the market.

However, it must be noted that the process does not end with just system testing.  A common mistake is forgetting the analysis of test results.  While the tests find errors in the application, it is the analysis that interprets that same error.  Without the interpretation, the testing conducted would be useless.  To further explain the reason why failure to get the analysis is a mistake, let us take the software interface test.

Though there are many testing methods available, companies and developers have considered software interface testing as the most important system test to ensure the quality of a program.  The interface is composed of sets of commands, images, messages, and other features that permit communication between the user and device.  According to developers, the very advantage of interface testing is in the fact that it is anchored on the feedback of end users themselves.  There are two characters involved in the process – the user and moderator.  Each of them is assigned their respective tasks that are vital to the progress of the software application.  First, the user is allowed to use the program.  He or she is then tasked to note down comments about the program, its individual features and its general usage as well.  These comments should be on how easy and efficient the program is when being used.  Navigating can also be an area where the user can issue comments.  The more detailed the comments of the user are, the better.  Likewise, all aspects of the program must be looked into.  Some of these aspects include functionality, being user-friendly, and the performance of the new application.  The moderator, on the other hand, conducts the test.  It is not necessary for him or her to communicate with the user.  What he or she is assigned to do is document all the comments of the user regarding the program.  At the end of the testing period, the moderator is expected to endorse the feedback made by the user to the developer.  Here analysis starts to play a role.  The comments must be interpreted in such a way that the error in the program should be given an appropriate solution.

With the example on software interface testing, developers would definitely need analysis of the test result so he or she could make the corresponding revisions based on the feedback of the user.  Remember that the aim of any developer is to perfect the new software application.  This can only be done with comprehensive testing processes.  Likewise, firms are very keen on improving the product quality.  This is because their possible earnings from the software would rely so much on its potential.  Thus, companies would require software test results analysis to be able to ensure quality and guarantee good returns.
—

If you are interested in software test results analysis, check this web-site to learn more about tool testing results roi.